|

by Amanda Jean Clothier
Before my daughter was born, I considered using
cloth diapers. After all, I like to think of myself
as environmentally conscious. I recycle. I buy
organic food. I’ve been known to scold a litterbug
or two. But as soon as I became a mom, I went
straight for the Pampers. I never even tried cloth
diapers. Disposables are just easier.
There are good reasons to try cloth diapers. The
main argument is the environmental impact of
disposables. Aside from the ongoing debate about
which is worse for the environment, washing all
those cloth diapers or tossing the disposables,
there’s no denying that disposables create a lot of
garbage. Twenty billion disposable diapers end up in
landfills each year.
And then there’s the savings. Advocates of cloth
diapers say they’re much less expensive to use than
disposables, even when you factor in the costs of
running the washing machine and buying
environmentally friendly, baby-safe detergent. And
your savings increase if you use the diapers again
on other children or resell them when you’re done.
So I got to wondering: How have cloth diapers
changed since I was a baby? Are there parents who
still use them? I’ve read online about these mystery
moms, but I certainly don’t know any of them.
The wondering led to an experiment.
I decided to give cloth diapers a try. And while
I was at it, I decided to compare several types of
disposable diapers. I was interested in comparing
five factors: cost, convenience, ease of use,
smell/leakage and perceived comfort for my
7-month-old daughter, Emma.
The first thing I discovered during my research
is that diaper services are a thing of the past. The
companies that launder dirty diapers and drop off
stacks of clean ones at your house have gone the way
of the dinosaur. There might be one or two still
lurking about Atlanta, but for most parents, diaper
services are no longer a viable option.
The standard cloth diaper accessories – safety
pins and rubber pants – are also relics. Now, cloth
diapers are actually stylish. They come in many
different colors and patterns. Two of the popular
types are pocket insert diapers (waterproof cloth
shells that use absorbent terrycloth inserts to
absorb wetness) and all-in-ones (diapers with the
absorbent pads built in to a waterproof outer
layer.) The manufacturers advertise that new
materials, such as microfibers, make cloth diapers
less difficult to rinse than the old cotton kind.
Rhiannen Laurent, a mom from East Lake, says she
registered for a couple of packs of All in Ones (Bummis
brand) when she was expecting her baby. Her friends
and family were surprised that she wanted to use
them at all. "I’m the only person I know who’s tried
them. Everyone is scared of them. Even my mom
thought I was insane," she says. Laurent has
incorporated AIOs (all-in-ones) into her daily
routine, although she still uses disposables on her
daughter for outings and overnights.
Other moms, like Lisa Czech of Decatur, say they
have never even considered cloth diapers because
disposables are so readily available. The
environmental impact is a concern, however, and she
says, "I would love it if they came out with
something biodegradable." But for now, disposables
win out for Czech: "I don’t think I would try
something different unless something new came out on
the market."
For my experiment, I tried Fuzzi Buns pocket
insert diapers and Bumkins AIOs for one full day and
night. I compared them with several types of
disposable diapers: Pampers Swaddlers (which I’d
been using), Huggies, Costco’s Kirkland Signature
brand, and a generic brand purchased at Diaper
Depot. Here are my results:
| |
Pampers Swaddlers
|
Huggies
Step 3 |
Costco Kirkland House Brand |
Diaper Depot Generic Diapers |
Fuzzi Buns |
Bumkins AIOs |
|
Cost |
$17.48 for 84
$0.20/each
(at Target) |
$26
for 144
$0.18/each
(at Target) |
$29.99
for 184
$0.16/each |
$19.95
for 144
$0.13/each |
$14.95/each
12 pack for $167.00 |
$16/each for plain white
$18/each for patterns |
|
Convenience |
A
Available in grocery and
discount department stores*
|
A
Available in grocery and
discount department stores* |
B
Start at Size 3 |
B
Requires special trip to Diaper
Depot location |
C
Requires washing but did not
require any special laundering;
inserts have to be placed back
inside diapers |
B
Requires washing and had to run
through dryer twice to get
completely dry |
|
Smell Factor/ Leakage |
A-
No odor problems,
but strong perfume scent |
A |
A |
D
Bad first
experience w/dirty diaper; no
leakage w/wet diapers |
D
Wet clothes
several times during first time
use |
B
One
incident of wet clothes during
first time use |
|
Ease of Use |
A
|
A
|
B
Tape didn’t stick easily |
B
Had to pull
diapers apart |
C
Inserts require
extra time to place in diapers |
B+
Easy but bulky
under clothes |
|
Perceived Comfort for Baby |
B+
Ok but some times
causes red marks on baby’s legs |
B+ |
B+ |
B
Material isn’t as
soft as Pampers
|
A
Soft and dry
against baby’s skin with
frequent changing |
B
Soft inside but
hard to tell if bulkiness is
bothersome |
|
Overall Grade: |
A- |
A |
B+ |
B- |
C |
B |
*
(Prices may
be cheaper at discount member stores.)
My Previous Experience
I primarily use Pampers. They feel
substantial and it’s easy to tell when
they are wet, using the "squish test."
The squish test refers to the absorbent
material inside diapers that turns to
gel when wet. The only thing I don’t
like about Pampers is the strong baby
powder scent. It’s not a stretch to say
I trust Pampers. (It sounds like a
commercial, but it’s true.) I’ve also
tried Kroger and Target brands but came
back to Pampers because the gel in those
house-brand diapers got onto my baby’s
skin.
Huggies Step 3
These diapers are not much different
than Pampers either, except for the lack
of fragrance. I didn’t have any leakage
problems, and I could utilize the squish
test. I went into this experiment
expecting not to like them, because I
had talked to other people who liked
Pampers better. But after trying
Huggies, I found I liked them just as
well if not more than Pampers Swaddlers.
Costco’s Kirkland Signature
The Kirkland Signature brand is
supplied by Kimberly-Clark, the maker of
Huggies, and the diapers aren’t much
different than Pampers or Huggies. There
seems to be less gel-like material in
them, so it’s harder to apply the squish
test to these diapers, but I could still
tell when the baby needed to be changed.
The smallest size that Costco stocks is
Size 3 (for babies 16-28 lbs.), so you
wouldn’t be able to use this brand for
newborns. The Velcro tape doesn’t stick
as well as it does in other brands, and
I had to redo the tape a couple of times
during diaper changes. But overall, I
didn’t have any leakage problems. I like
that they are unscented, and I would
definitely buy them again.
Diaper Depot Generic Diapers
I had never heard of Diaper Depot
before this experiment. There are a few
stores in the Atlanta area that sell
bulk quantities of generic diapers,
including the Decatur location I checked
out. The whole experience was a bit
mysterious. The store is basically a
room with a counter and lots of boxes.
When I went there to pick up a case of
diapers, a woman in the back was gone
for at least 10 minutes before someone
else appeared with my purchase. When I
got home and opened the case, the
diapers were hand packed. Not knowing
where the diapers came from made me a
little uncomfortable, so I called and
asked about it. An employee told me the
store buys from various manufacturers,
including Kimberly-Clark, and the
diapers come from the factory hand
packed. Getting them shipped directly
without the extra packaging within each
case helps cut the cost.
The diaper sides stuck together when
I tried to open them, but overall they
were similar to the Kirkland Signature
brand in style and thickness. However,
the second diaper of the day was the
messiest to date. This may have been a
fluke, especially because the diaper
seemed to fit well. I didn’t have any
problems with leakage during the day or
overnight, but I won’t be trying out any
more Diaper Depot diapers because of the
mess I encountered with that monster of
a dirty diaper – even if it was a fluke.
Fuzzi Buns
The pocket insert diapers are bulkier
than disposables. I like the soft and
cozy feel of them, but my biggest
complaint is that it’s difficult to tell
when these diapers are wet (since
there’s no gel, the squish test doesn’t
work). I had a couple cases of phantom
wetness, where I thought Emma was wet
when she wasn’t. Then, other times, her
clothes were damp, the outer cover of
the diaper was dry, and the diaper layer
closest to her skin, which is
microfiber, was mostly dry. It was
almost like the moisture was transferred
to her clothes. I learned quickly that I
had to be more vigilant about changing
the diapers (checking them every hour or
so) because they don’t hold as much
moisture as disposables.
By midafternoon I was fed up with the
Fuzzi Buns and decided to give up and
try again the next day. The next day
brought more of the same, so I returned
to the Fuzzi Buns Web site to see if I
was doing anything wrong – and it turns
out that sometimes you need to use two
inserts. I doubled up on the inserts at
night, hating that I couldn’t trust
these diapers to keep my daughter dry
overnight. When I did change Emma’s
diaper in the middle of the night, it
turned out to be another case of phantom
wetness. How frustrating! I gave up
(again) and put a Pampers on her so I
could get a decent night’s sleep. I
wanted to like these diapers, but in the
end I just couldn’t trust them to keep
my baby dry.
Bumkins All-in-Ones
The first thing I noticed about these
diapers is how big they are. Big and
bulky. They come in plain white and some
cute patterns (zebra stripes and a
swirly pink retro design, among others.)
The outside layer is made of polyester
but feels like soft plastic. These
diapers, like the Fuzzi Buns, require
more changes than disposables, but I
seemed to keep up with them better. No
phantom wetness. And once I got the
diapers on, they seemed less bulky. I
had to do a diaper change at a friend’s
house and was nervous about having to do
a complete costume change. Emma was wet
but I took off the slightly wet onesie
underneath her clothes, without having
to don a whole new outfit. I didn’t feel
confident about getting through the
night without a change, especially after
my Fuzzi Buns experience. So when Emma
woke up around 10 p.m., I changed her
diaper (it was wet) and switched back to
disposables for the rest of the night.
I’d consider using Bumkins during the
day at home but probably not out or
overnight.
Conclusion
As my experiment draws to a close,
here’s what I’ve learned: I’m impatient.
After trying out cloth diapers, I bow to
my grandmothers and great-grandmothers
before me who managed to keep their
babies clean and dry without the godsend
that is the disposable diaper. Having
said that, I also bow to you women out
there today who choose to use cloth
diapers. I see now that it can be done.
It’s not gross or disgusting. It just
requires a lot of patience, more than I
have. And in all fairness, the Fuzzi
Buns probably would have received a
better review if I had tried them last,
after I realized what was required. This
is definitely a choice that only a
parent actively committed to
environmental consumerism would make.
As far as disposables go, I’m
switching to Costco’s Kirkland Signature
brand. Since we’re members of Costco,
they’re the cheapest for us, and I
didn’t have any bad experiences with
them. They also reminded me how much I
dislike the strong baby powder scent of
Pampers. If on occasion I run out of the
Costco brand, either Pampers or Huggies
will suffice.
The bottom line
Regarding cost, here’s the math I
used.
Approximate cost of diapering
over 2½ years:
8 Pampers/day over
2.5 years = 7,300 diapers
7,300 diapers at $0.20/each
(purchased at Target) =
$1,460
Minimum number of
Fuzzi Buns needed: 12
(purchased online as a package
at a discount)
$167/12 small +
$167/12 medium + $167/12 large =
$501
Minimum number of Fuzzi Buns I’d want for convenience:
18
$501 + $269.10 (for six
additional diapers in small, medium
and large) =
$770.10
Minimum number of
Bumkins needed for daily use: 12
12 Plain white Bumkins @ $16/each
= $192
$192 x 3 (for sizes small, medium
and large) =
$576
Savings from using
cloth diapers: $689.90 to
$959.
I can live with spending the
extra money.
How do I continue to use disposables
and consider myself environmentally
conscious? I don’t think I can, at least
not for the next few years. But I can’t
help thinking… If moms like me switched
to cloth diapers, wouldn’t the diaper
companies be motivated to win us back? I
wouldn’t be surprised if that motivation
led to the best alternative yet: an
affordable, biodegradable disposable
diaper.
|